from Tumblr http://bit.ly/1Ac5Fb4
via IFTTT
#FRANCE #TERRORISM #ALJAZEERA #JeSuisCharlie #JournalismIsNotACrime: internal emails* showcase the breadth of opinions on the subject of freedom of speech v. bullying, victim-blaming v. victim-sanctifying, etc.
(* emails reproduced in full at the bottom of the article, http://bzfd.it/1B3RjIf)
QUOTE:
The internal staff email chain began with a Jan. 8 email from Al Jazeera English’s executive producer Salah-Aldeen Khadr, asking his reporters to interrogate whether the attack on the Charlie Hebdo newspaper was “really an attack on free speech” and whether the slogan “Je Suis Charlie/I Am Charlie” is “alienating.”
Describing the incident as a “clash of extremist fringes,” Khadr was highly critical of the Charlie Hebdo staff:
"Defending freedom of expression in the face of oppression is one thing; insisting on the right to be obnoxious and offensive just because you can is infantile. Baiting extremists isn’t bravely defiant when your manner of doing so is more significant in offending millions of moderate people as well. And within a climate where violent response—however illegitimate—is a real risk, taking a goading stand on a principle virtually no one contests is worse than pointless: it’s pointlessly all about you."
In response, U.S.-based correspondent Tom Ackerman quoted a Jan. 7 piece from Ross Douthat in the New York Times:
"If a large enough group of someone is willing to kill you for saying something, then it’s something that almost certainly needs to be said, because otherwise the violent have veto power over liberal civilization, and when that scenario obtains it isn’t really a liberal civilization any more…. liberalism doesn’t depend on everyone offending everyone else all the time, and it’s okay to prefer a society where offense for its own sake is limited rather than pervasive. But when offenses are policed by murder, that’s when we need more of them, not less, because the murderers cannot be allowed for a single moment to think that their strategy can succeed."
Doha-based reporter Mohamed Vall wrote that supporting Charlie Hebdo ran the risk of encouraging more killings:
"And I guess if you encourage people to go on insulting 1.5 billion people about their most sacred icons then you just want more killings because as I said in 1.5 billion there will remain some fools who don’t abide by the laws or know about free speech."d http://on.fb.me/1DMd7Hz
#USA #FERGUSON: a non-US perspective by First Dog On The Moon (@firstdogonmoon) http://on.fb.me/15xaM89
#CLIMATE CHANGE: faith AND fact - you can have it all.
Scientist and devout Christian Katharine Hayhoe (http://bit.ly/WP-KHayhoe) being interviewed by @BillMoyersHQ.
QUOTE:
For a long time, many of us have felt that scientists are on one side, espousing one set of values, and Christians and/or conservatives are on the other side. And so along comes this new issue of climate change, which in my opinion has enormous theological implications and is entirely consistent with the Christian faith, to love others and to love our neighbours. So along comes this issue of climate change, but who are the primary spokespeople? It’s these pointy-headed scientists, who have been on the other side of the fence on many other issues regarding creation and evolution, the age of the earth and even other issues today, like genetic modification and things like that. So. It’s no surprise that when you get a messenger who’s not trusted, who you perceive as not sharing your values, why would you believe them?
[…]
I get 5 times as much hate mail from Christians than from any other group.
[…]
Caring about climate is entirely consistent with who we are as Christians, but: over the last several decades, we have increasingly begun to confound our politics with our faith - to the point where instead of our faith dictating our attitudes on political and social issues, we are instead allowing our political party to dictate our attitude on issues that are clearly consistent with who we are.
[…]
We’ve been told that you can’t be a Christian, or you can’t be a conservative, or you can’t be a person of faith - or even a person of integrity - and agree that climate is changing, that humans are responsible and that there’s something really important we need to do about it.
/QUOTE
Full interview @ http://bit.ly/1xUmP7C http://on.fb.me/1xDf1sy
#AUSTRALIA #AsylumSeekers: options for dealing with refugees, by First Dog On The Moon.
(http://bit.ly/FDOTM_immi) http://on.fb.me/1pGSr1z
#AUSTRALIA #AsylumSeekers: SBS’s “Living With The Enemy” (episode 2) addresses the dynamic between someone with a virulently anti-everything view of refugees, and an actual refugee from Iran.
(http://bit.ly/1u7tZ6a) http://on.fb.me/1u7tZ6c
AUSTRALIA #AsylumSeekers #REFUGEES: the Temporary Protection Visa (#TPV) was last introduced by Howard - and it was disastrous. If assessed as “genuine” (as opposed to “economic”) refugees (and >90% are), why continue to punish them by holding the Temporary status over their heads? People need to start rebuilding their lives, not living as if they’re on parole.
They didn’t come all this way just to get drunk & lie on the beach collecting dole payments - that’s reserved for OUR young people. They want to work, they NEED to work - qualified doctors, police, plumbers & electricians are driving taxis, working in abattoirs, rounding up trolleys at shopping centres, cleaning offices at night…
More information and details on how to write your state’s Senators, at http://bit.ly/ASRC_TPVs http://on.fb.me/1rtTHiL
So many unfortunate similarities w/pictures of Jews during WW2…
RT @Farah_Gazan: Israeli army arrested 150 youths from Khuza’a in #Khanyounis and forces them to take their clothes off #Gaza #AJAGAZA http://bit.ly/1rW55HT http://on.fb.me/1zpcrGh
PHOTOS: (L) Jews, WW2; (R) Palestinians, now.
These should both horrify you. Equally so.
Perhaps more than equally, if you take into account who should have learned what lessons. http://on.fb.me/1zpcoKC
PHOTOS: (L) Jews, WW2; (R) Palestinians, now.
These should both horrify you. Equally so.
Perhaps more than equally, if you take into account who should have learned what lessons. http://on.fb.me/1zpcou6
PHOTOS: (L) Jews, WW2; (R) Palestinians, now.
These should both horrify you. Equally so.
Perhaps more than equally, if you take into account who should have learned what lessons. http://on.fb.me/1zpcnXb
PHOTOS: (L) Jews, WW2; (R) Palestinians, now.
These should both horrify you. Equally so.
Perhaps more than equally, if you take into account who should have learned what lessons. http://on.fb.me/1zpcnGB
PHOTOS: (L) Jews, WW2; (R) Palestinians, now.
These should both horrify you. Equally so.
Perhaps more than equally, if you take into account who should have learned what lessons. http://on.fb.me/1rW4UfE
PHOTOS: (L) Jews, WW2; (R) Palestinians, now.
These should both horrify you. Equally so.
Perhaps more than equally, if you take into account who should have learned what lessons. http://on.fb.me/1zpchPk
PHOTOS: (L) Jews, WW2; (R) Palestinians, now.
These should both horrify you. Equally so.
Perhaps more than equally, if you take into account who should have learned what lessons. http://on.fb.me/1rW4Tse
PHOTOS: (L) Jews, WW2; (R) Palestinians, now.
These should both horrify you. Equally so.
Perhaps more than equally, if you take into account who should have learned what lessons. http://on.fb.me/1zpccei
PHOTOS: (L) Jews, WW2; (R) Palestinians, now.
These should both horrify you. Equally so.
Perhaps more than equally, if you take into account who should have learned what lessons. http://on.fb.me/1zpcbHn
PHOTOS: (L) Jews, WW2; (R) Palestinians, now.
These should both horrify you. Equally so.
Perhaps more than equally, if you take into account who should have learned what lessons. http://on.fb.me/1rW4HZX